Why Does Voter Fraud Always Help the Democrats? Oh… I Know.
It turns out that ACORN isn’t the only group capable of blatant voter fraud. Certain elected Democrat councilwomen in our New Jersey neighborhood don’t mind engaging in the practice, either.
On March 9, there will be held a special election in Bergen County’s Borough of Rutherford because of an alleged 7 to 21 counts of absentee ballot “irregularities.” And by “irregularities,” I mean Democrat-voters-voting-as-their-mothers-who-live-in-Ireland.
Thanks, Councilwoman Maura Keyes.
On November 3, 2009 – election night – Republican council candidate Todd Hennessey was found to be the winner of the Rutherford council election by a small margin against Democrat candidate John Parnofiello. The next day, Hennessy learned that “new” absentee ballots had been found, however, and over the course of the next few days, enough mail-in votes had been “found” to turn the election over to the Democrat.
By ONE vote: 2,719 to 2,718.
Does the public ever notice that in cases of voter fraud, it is always the losing Democrat candidate who mysteriously ends up beating the Republican?
Thankfully, this time Todd Hennessy took matters in to his own hands and went through every mail-in ballot himself with an independent investigator, and he discovered that several voters were actually not residents of Rutherford. And in an AMAZING streak of irony, every one of the illegal ballots had cast their vote for Democrat Parnofiello.
It would have been simple enough for a judge to throw out the fraudulent ballots and declare Hennessy the victor. But of course, Democrats don’t like to play fair when they lose, so Democrat-appointed Judge Estela M. De La Cruz had both parties agree to a special election that will end up costing the town $30,000.
Thanks, Judge De la Cruz.
Until March 9th, meanwhile, the Todd Hennessy for Council campaign has been determined not to let their opponents get away with their criminal activity – or the election. The campaign is actively working and asking for support at their headquarters, 114 Park Avenue in Rutherford.
Hennessey, who has stated that he will keep a close eye on the special election, is also making sure that the voter fraud offenses are taken seriously:
Bergen County Superintendent of Elections Patricia DiCostanzo said her office is looking into the allegations of voter fraud that stemmed from the recount challenge mounted by Rutherford council candidate Todd Hennessey.
DiConstanzo said she decided to undertake the investigation after the recount challenge filed by Republican candidate Todd Hennessey included allegations that as many as seven different people who no longer lived in Rutherford had cast mail-in ballots in the election. However, she said the department is conducting its own investigation to determine whether these allegations are justified. Any evidence of fraud or other wrongdoing would be forwarded to the Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office.
Leland Moore, a representative for the New Jersey Attorney General’s office, said that mail-in voter fraud is regarded as a third degree crime, which means it could carry a penalty of three to five years in state prison and a criminal fine of up to $15,000.
For more information about the special election or to find out how you can help before March 9th, feel free to contact me here.
“Does the public ever notice that in cases of voter fraud, it is always the losing Democrat candidate who mysteriously ends up beating the Republican?”
Election 2000 was voter fraud at its best…and it went “W”’s way. So, once again you have no clue.
February 28th, 2010 at 6:51 amThe FL EC election was NOT falsified. George Bush won honestly, as proved by Randall Hoven.
On the other hand, the Democrats DID falsify a US presidential election – the 1960 presidential election. LBJ falsified votes in Texas and Richard Daley Senior falsified votes in IL. JFK would’ve never won without fake votes.
February 28th, 2010 at 8:50 amThis is a joke…right Zbiggy? Randall Hoven? Conservative Randall Hoven? Proves what. That conservatives KNOW that Bush won. Fla. had Jeb Bush as Governor, and future idiot congresswoman Katherine Harris as Sec. of State. Enough said. Please…don’t make a fool of yourself again.
February 28th, 2010 at 1:38 pmHere’s one for you Zbiggy…
Date Event Gore Gain Gore Deficit
or Lead
11/27/00 Certified by Katherine Harris -537
12/8/00 Florida Supreme Court ruling +383 -154
February 28th, 2010 at 1:44 pm12/18/00 Lake County (Orlando Sentinel) +130 – 24
12/19/00 Broward (Palm Beach Post) +164 +140
12/29/00 Hernando (Hernando Today) +4 +144
12/30/00 Hillsborough (Tampa Tribune) +120 +264
1/3/01 Gadsden (Democrats.com) +40 +304
1/14/01 Miami-Dade #1 (Palm Beach Post) – minus prior recount included in 12/8
-6
+11
-209 +100
1/20/01 Collier (Naples News) -226 -126
1/27/01 Palm Beach #1 (Palm Beach Post) +682 +556
1/28/01 15 County (Orlando Sentinel) -minus prior recounts in Lake and Gadsden +366
-170 +752
2/10/01 Orange (Orlando Sentinel) +203 +955
2/15/01 Seminole (Orlando Sentinel) +13 +968
2/26/01 Miami-Dade #2 (Miami Herald)
also: how the media twisted this recount into a “Gore lost” story +49 +1,017
3/8/01 Osceola (Orlando Sentinel) +25 +1,042
3/10/01 Palm Beach #2 (Palm Beach Post) +102 +1,144
3/10/01 Martin, St. Lucie (Palm Beach Post) +92 +1,236
Total Gore Gain from Recounts +1,773
“Please…don’t make a fool of yourself again.”
If anyone ever made himself a fool on this website, it was you, junior. You know NOTHING about politics or the recent history of your own country (not a surprise, given that your beloved Dems have mismanaged American schools).
Here’s the proof:
“On November 7, 2000, voters went to the polls and elected George W. Bush to be President of the United States. After initially conceding defeat in a private phone call to Bush, Al Gore decided instead to contest the outcome in Florida. He sued for various recounts and was joined by the Florida Supreme Court, while Bush fought for counting votes per the rules in place prior to the election.
Complaints that Bush “stole” the election boiled down to two: (1) we should use a method of determining the winner other than the one in the Constitution, and (2) we should use a method of determining “voter intent” other than by counting legally cast ballots per the rules in place prior to the election.
Later recounts would show that George W. Bush would have won the election in Florida under any method considered by either Al Gore or the Florida Supreme Court.
“The Miami Herald and USA Today reported George W. Bush would have widened his 537-vote victory to a 1,665-vote margin if the recount ordered by the Florida Supreme Court would have been allowed to continue.”"
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/08/a_brief_history_of_bushs_time.html
So if the FSC-ordered recount had been continued, Bush’s FL victory margin would’ve INCREASED. Bush – unlike JFK – was a legally elected, fairly elected President. Your hero Gore is a sore loser, just like yourself.
February 28th, 2010 at 1:55 pmHahahahah….American Thinker…yeah, there’s an unbiased sources…hahahahah…
February 28th, 2010 at 2:16 pmFor everyone of yours…I could show you 5 of mine…to “prove” that W stole the election with the help of his brother and the republicans in place in Fla. Point is, voter fraud is rampant and its not just limited to dems as Sharon so un-eloquently pointed out. She hasn’t a clue as to what happened..
February 28th, 2010 at 2:19 pmYes, AT is an unbiased source. It is a credible e-magazine, unlike the Salon, Newsweek and TDB.
Sharon doesn’t have a clue as to what happened? Maybe. But certainly you don’t know what happened, Junior. You are worse informed about 20th century history than the Ukrainians, but they can claim an excuse – they’re simply not taught about real history.
February 28th, 2010 at 3:11 pmI think it’s hard to top Al Franken’s theft of the Minnesota Senatorial election.
Votes in car trunks?
Ambrosiajr, Al Gore wanted to count only counties that went heavily democrat. Also, he kept changing how he wanted votes counted. From chads hanging by one corner, to two corners, to dimpled chads. Dems always point out a heavily Republican Supreme Court named George Bush he winner. But for some reason forget a heavily democratic Florida State Supreme Court kept agreeing with Gore.
February 28th, 2010 at 3:22 pmSo why does voter suppression always benefit Republicans?
Ask Ed Rollins.
February 28th, 2010 at 5:25 pmMillicent Fenwick, your right. It seems that suppressing the illegal alien vote, the dead peoples vote, and people voting multiple times just ALWAYS seems to benefit Republicans!
Now, I wonder why?
February 28th, 2010 at 8:47 pmFunny how Democrats still believe that their failure to steal the 2000 presidential election proves that Republicans cheat. Democrats are just frustrated thieves accusing the intended victims of what they themselves were thwarted in doing. I guess the Democrats have told the lie so many times they believe it. To it’s shame Minnesota allowed the Democrats to steal the election for Al Franken, I’m sure the Democrats think that is as it should be. George Soros and the “Secretary of State Project” are making a concerted effort to steal all the close elections. If a Secretary of State candidate in your state has taken money from them just be aware that voter fraud WILL happen in close elections.
March 9th, 2010 at 2:37 pmHey Trevor, keeping illegal “voters” out of elections benefits always Republicans because it’s always Democrats perpetrating the frauds.
March 9th, 2010 at 2:39 pm